Week Six

        Does Ability Grouping Work? Isn't this a question we have been asking ourselves for all the years we have been involved in education? 

        My intuition and my observations have always leaned toward the side of ability grouping only benefiting gifted and talented learners. 

        From a personal observation, I know my own daughter benefits greatly from advanced and accelerated curriculum and problem-based learning opportunities that are provided in an advanced content model of gifted education. In the classroom, I have had "high performing" classes who I was able to push harder and to cover content with much faster. I was able to enhance the learning experiences for the higher half and hone in on the needs of the slightly lower performers. Then I have had classes where only one quarter of the students would be considered average performers. Every procedure, every concept, every single moment required so much support that I found myself feeling like I was treading water just to keep up with all the individual needs. Those years hurt! Those years required more hours after school, before school, all the time, in the books and in collaboration, searching for answers.

        I am a huge proponent of building upon the collective knowledge and conversation. Instead of being only as strong as a weakest link, I see high achieving students as life rafts who pull everyone to the surface with them. I love to see high achieving students empowered to teach what skills they have mastered and the sponge-like capacity of lower achieving students who are learning from a whole group or small group conversation. Some of the best moments are when the lower achieving student grasps a concept they have been struggling to reach and then turns to explain it to someone else they know has been struggling. 

        This leads me to what I feel is an overlooked problem with a practice in my district. Our gifted-identified and some high-achieving students receive an advanced curriculum model while our students qualifying as at risk or who receive special education services are grouped together with some high-achieving students and average achievers. I feel that the collaborative and conversational benefits are diminished and overload the teachers with accommodation requirements. I feel that we place a ceiling on the non-gifted/high achiever classes and place the risk of burnout squarely upon those teachers. Even with Early Intervention teachers in place in elementary grade levels, they do not provide services throughout the day, and the thirty minutes of small group support hardly seems to be beneficial in most cases. By the time these students reach middle school, there is little, if any, of this support. 

        In the readings, the section dedicated to tutoring got me thinking of the benefits of merging these class groupings on a regular basis in order to capitalize on peer tutoring. Would this be a solution? Would the social implications be positive or feed bullying in the middle school environment? How would this look if implemented during academic opportunity times each day? As professional learning community facilitator for my content area on my grade level for the next year, I may just have the avenue to try this on for size.

Comments

  1. Another great week here with your blog post. I appreciate the number of times you linked the reading to your classroom practice. Well Done!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week Five

Week Three

Week Four